Home


Shop


Benefit


Test


Watch


Question


Locate


Contact


Link

Tests

Cars


Consumers Digest

"We were somewhat skeptical at first, but it turns out that the product does exactly what the manufacturer claims it does. In fact, the more we looked, the more facts stacked up on the products side."

Click here for a summary
Click here for witnessed extract



US Dept Of Energy

Found that with a 5 % increase in fuel economy, approximately 100 million barrels of fuel would be saved annually. Their test on Xcelplus Permanent Engine Protection concluded the following increase in fuel economy:

Urban     +6.9 %
Highway +5.31 %

Click here for a summary
Click here for signed DOE letter summarising findings.
 

Utah University

Independent testing by the United States Attorney General found:

  • Plating of the metal surfaces did occur

  • Oil filter clogging is not indicated

  • Friction average -12.6 %

  • Fuel usage avg  -17.5 %

  • Horsepower avg +15.6 %

Click here for a summary
Click here for the original summary
Click here for the original report


Automotive Service Councils of Pennsylvania

Three cars were run without oil: Three cars were treated with Xcelplus Permanent Engine Protection. Six months later, the oil was drained from each vehicle, and the cars were driven, without oil plugs, for about a half hour. The water temperature never rose, and the engines sustained no apparent damage.

Click here for the summary
Click here for the original report


Le Tourneau University

Conducted a test proving the fuel economy gains achieved by treated engines with Xcelplus Permanent Engine Protection. After driving 800 miles, mileage per gallon increased from 16 mpg to 21.8 mpg. (highway driving)

Click here for a summary
Click here for the original report


TUV

A prestigious Motor Test Lab in Germany, conducted testing on Xcelplus Products and the results showed,

“… a measurable reduction in the frictional losses through the addition of Xcelplus to the engine, gear box and back axle oils.”

Click here for a summary
Click here for the original report


Bilsport

3 vehicles tested

  • Fuel consumption decreased 10.1 - 14.6 %
  • Volume CO (Carbon Monoxide) decreased 38.3 - 76.0 %
  • HC (Hydro Carbons) ppm decreased 22.9 - 33.3 %
  • Rolling distance increased 22.6 - 62.35 %
  • Performance improvements remain after an oil change

Click here for a summary
Click here for the original report


Engineering Research & Application (ERA) Ltd

In England conducted a test on Xcelplus Permanent Engine Protection and reported the following increase in fuel economy:

Urban -     +7 %
90 KPH-     +5.15 %
120 KPH-  +11.32 %

Click here for a summary
Click here for the original report


Nantes University (France)

Conducted a full load test on Xcelplus Permanent Engine Protection proving: Internal engine friction decreased while horsepower and torque increased. They stated that “a single treatment with Xcelplus Engine Protection will provide a substantial savings due to improved engine efficiency and lubrication”

At full load Test Results
Friction  
        -16 %
Torque          +4.7 %
Horsepower   +4.7 %
Acceleration   +17 %

Click here for a summary
Click here for the original report


Heavy Machinery

Swedish Institute Of Agricultural Engineering

Found a decrease in the amount of harmful carbon dust emissions and fuel consumption achieved through the use of Xcelplus Permanent Engine Protection.

Click here for the report


Aircraft

FAA (Federal Aviation Authority)

Found engine friction at take off and cruise RPM’s lowered 25 to 30 percent when aircraft engines are treated with Xcelpus Permanent Engine Protection. Also, oil consumption after ten hours of testing was a mere one pint. (Normal acceptable oil consumption averages one quart per two hours.) They concluded by stating that they “..Would consider all findings to be better than acceptable standards."

Click here for the abbreviated report
Click here for the complete report 193 pages ~8MB (.pdf)


Military

Army (Fort Hood)

Found virtually no wear or deterioration to all components treated with Xcelplus Products. All internal parts were sent to a N.A.S.A. lab for detailed inspection. Testing at N.A.S.A. proved the coating to be 1 micron thick and bonded to the metal surfaces.

Click here for summary of findings (including NASA photo's of treated surfaces).
Click here for the complete report


Other


Franklin Institute (picture of coated surface)

Tried to remove the permanent coating that Xcelplus products apply to lubricated metal surfaces but were unable to do so. They concluded that ‛‛The above experiments show that coating to be 1 to 2 microns thick and bonded to the surface.”

Click here for the summarised report
Click here for original report
 


Cranfield University (5 yr test)

In England conducted a 5 Year Test on the effect Xcelplus Permanent Engine Protection has on metals. This test led to two important conclusions:
• As compared to ordinary oil, Xcelplus Permanent Engine Protection dramatically extends the life of the metal.
• The product coats the metal surfaces, causing the treated "dry" metal to outperform untreated "dry" metal.

Click here for the report



Southwest Research Institute

Click here for a report on the basic lubrication properties


Detroit Allison (Lab analysis)

A division of General Motors Corporation, tested Xcelplus Permanent Engine Protection and stated that Xcelplus

"...is an all organic material which does not lend itself to laboratory-type analysis.”

Click here for the letter


MSDS (Material Safety Data Sheets)

Engine treatment (pdf)
Grease (pdf)
Upper Cylinder (2-stroke) Lubricant (pdf)
Lubricant (a light lubricating liquid) (pdf)